Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

October 03 2016

8080 7269 500
8106 e487 500

June 12 2016

8118 828d 500
8137 bc0c 500
8179 8d4f 500

May 29 2016

8236 b2f1

May 26 2016

8251 c4a8 500

May 23 2016

So I was at the school gym today alone

I sometimes ask my PE teacher for the keys because he knows I don’t like team games but I do enjoy lifting some weights. I was doing a little back exercises using bar, trying to focus on the posture to do it right with the weights later. And the other PE teacher was walking by and he came in telling me how wrong I do deadlifts (though I wasn’t deadlifting). He started showing me how to do it to make my butt work (although I wanted to do my back this day) and what to focus on to lean my legs. I said nothing at that moment, but now I think how soft-sexist it was. I mean, I’m a girl, but it doesn’t mean I only exercise legs and butt. I’m sure he wouldn’t have suggested any boy to do biceps if he had been doing legs. So why he suggested me to do butt when I was doing back?

And if I do the deadlifts, I put some weights on that bar, boy.

May 19 2016

8270 56c2 500
8292 1c21 500

May 17 2016

8304 b2ee 500
8338 0f73 500

c-inefilia:

Kieslowski, Polish filmmaker - Luc Lagier

This goal is to capture what lies within us, but there’s no way to filming it. You can only get nearer to it. It’s a great subject literature. It’s probably the only subject in the world. Great literature does not only get near to it, it’s in a position to describe it. I suspect there are a few hundred books in the world which have managed to achieve a full description of what lies within us. Camus wrote books like that. Dostoevsky wrote books like that. The greek dramatists, Faulkner, Kafka (…). Literature can achieve this, cinema can’t. It can’t because it doesn’t have the means. It’s not intelligent enough. Consequently, it’s not equivocal enough. Yet, at the same time, while being too explicit, it’s also too equivocal…[a bottle of spilt milk or a cigarette lighter lit] will never mean anything else. If once in ten thousand times it turns out to mean something else, that means somebody has achieved a miracle. Welles achieved that miracle once. Only one director in the world has managed to achieve that miracle in the last few years and that’s Tarkovsky. Bergman achieved that miracle a few times. Fellini achieved it a few times. Ken Loach, too, in Kes. (Kieslowski on Kieslowski, edited by Danusia Stok)

8351 82ba
8361 6609

May 16 2016

April 28 2016

8376 a0c9 500

thecoolcoolcat:

😂😂😂

April 27 2016

8385 170b
8400 5903
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl